<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elitist Bastard Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/</link>
	<description>All the etcetera that&#039;s fit to read.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: valter</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-155441</link>
		<dc:creator>valter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-155441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Forte&quot; is (also) an Italian word and the 4th edition of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (see http://www.bartleby.com/61/0/F0270000.html) claims that its use in the English language is in fact derived from the Italian, not the French language.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the record, the primary meaning of &quot;forte&quot; in Italian is &quot;strong&quot; (as opposed to debole/weak), but it is also used idiomatically as in English (i.e., to refer to someone&#039;s absolute or comparative advantage.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forte&#8221; is (also) an Italian word and the 4th edition of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (see <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/61/0/F0270000.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bartleby.com/61/0/F0270000.html</a>) claims that its use in the English language is in fact derived from the Italian, not the French language.</p>
<p>For the record, the primary meaning of &#8220;forte&#8221; in Italian is &#8220;strong&#8221; (as opposed to debole/weak), but it is also used idiomatically as in English (i.e., to refer to someone&#8217;s absolute or comparative advantage.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s the Thought that Counts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Elitist Bastards #4</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-155198</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s the Thought that Counts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of the Elitist Bastards #4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-155198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of English fluency, I was particularly happy to see in the carnival a thorough explanation of elitist bastard language. Even though I&#8217;m generally against trying to live up to the &#8220;bastard&#8221; title, I do [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of English fluency, I was particularly happy to see in the carnival a thorough explanation of elitist bastard language. Even though I&#8217;m generally against trying to live up to the &#8220;bastard&#8221; title, I do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154937</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154937</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tilsim:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;And Hartman has only one n… zut alors!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;re not uptight here. You can say &quot;bordel de merde&quot; if you like.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tilsim:</p>
<blockquote><p>And Hartman has only one n… zut alors!</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re not uptight here. You can say &#8220;bordel de merde&#8221; if you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154738</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrea M:
Indeed I do. Fixed. Thanks for the correction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea M:<br />
Indeed I do. Fixed. Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea M</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154663</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps you mean Penne all&#039;arraBBiata. Double b there please. And truncation of alla is rather more elegant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you mean Penne all&#8217;arraBBiata. Double b there please. And truncation of alla is rather more elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobalt</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154528</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. &lt;3&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154524</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tilsim:
It turns out that principle has several names, including Hartman&#039;s Law and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Muphry&#039;s (sic) Law&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though &quot;The Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation&quot; captures the essence of the &quot;grammatical irony&quot; I was aiming at, above.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tilsim:<br />
It turns out that principle has several names, including Hartman&#8217;s Law and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law" rel="nofollow">Muphry&#8217;s (sic) Law</a>.</p>
<p>Though &#8220;The Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation&#8221; captures the essence of the &#8220;grammatical irony&#8221; I was aiming at, above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decrepitoldfool</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154518</link>
		<dc:creator>decrepitoldfool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hallelujah!  A certain class of commenters seems Hell-bent on destroying their credibility before it is established by testing how many of these rules they can violate.  Is it that difficult to &lt;em&gt;spell&lt;/em&gt;, or to tell &#039;their&#039; from &#039;there&#039;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallelujah!  A certain class of commenters seems Hell-bent on destroying their credibility before it is established by testing how many of these rules they can violate.  Is it that difficult to <em>spell</em>, or to tell &#8216;their&#8217; from &#8216;there&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tilsim</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154473</link>
		<dc:creator>Tilsim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154473</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And Hartman has only one n... zut alors!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Hartman has only one n&#8230; zut alors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tilsim</title>
		<link>http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/comment-page-1/#comment-154472</link>
		<dc:creator>Tilsim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooblick.com/weblog/2008/08/25/elitist-bastard-language/#comment-154472</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That would be Hartmann&#039;s Law, or the Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be Hartmann&#8217;s Law, or the Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

